The Jewish Communist Genocide - Historical Censorship
May 20th 2007 08:43
One thing that you never seem to come by in history books or the typical Hollywood blockbuster is the communists in Eastern Europe that went on a genocide killing some twenty million people. Conveniently enough some members of this communist party happened to be Jewish.
The reason why this isn't mainstream knowledge is because it would make it seem like Jews 'had it coming'. Hitler rode off the actions of the communists to gain the publics approval so that he may do what he did to the Jews.
This reality should not be forgotten, not because the Jews really deserved to die for being Jewish but because it shows how propaganda works, how Hitler managed to convince the population of his country that all Jews were inherently evil from the actions of a few.
It's fact the communist party had prominent Jewish members, it's fact there was a genocide that would make the holocaust seem only moderately bad, but it's also fact that Hitler used this as an opportunity to kill millions of innocent people, millions of innocent Jews. I don't think I need to mention that it's also fact the genocide had political, not religious motivations.
What’s alarming to me is that people are being imprisoned for bringing this into light, for instance Hans Schmidt was sent to prison for publishing a newsletter about the Jewish Communists. While I understand that he may have written the paper with an actual distaste for Jews I do not approve of him being imprisoned for his views.
At the very least it would be easier to learn about what happened in the past, it beats learning about the existence of a communist party that went on a genocide from a hate group. I don't want to read about how evil Jews are for being Jewish, I want to learn about how terrible some political ideologies are. You just can't do that when you're reading something coming from a hate group.
People say we should never forget the lessons of the holocaust, perhaps the real lesson behind the holocaust was never learned to be forgotten because here we are, a few decades on, at it again.
*Death Toll Source
*The Silencing of Hans Schmidt (Not so sure about the integrity of this source)
The reason why this isn't mainstream knowledge is because it would make it seem like Jews 'had it coming'. Hitler rode off the actions of the communists to gain the publics approval so that he may do what he did to the Jews.
This reality should not be forgotten, not because the Jews really deserved to die for being Jewish but because it shows how propaganda works, how Hitler managed to convince the population of his country that all Jews were inherently evil from the actions of a few.
It's fact the communist party had prominent Jewish members, it's fact there was a genocide that would make the holocaust seem only moderately bad, but it's also fact that Hitler used this as an opportunity to kill millions of innocent people, millions of innocent Jews. I don't think I need to mention that it's also fact the genocide had political, not religious motivations.
What’s alarming to me is that people are being imprisoned for bringing this into light, for instance Hans Schmidt was sent to prison for publishing a newsletter about the Jewish Communists. While I understand that he may have written the paper with an actual distaste for Jews I do not approve of him being imprisoned for his views.
At the very least it would be easier to learn about what happened in the past, it beats learning about the existence of a communist party that went on a genocide from a hate group. I don't want to read about how evil Jews are for being Jewish, I want to learn about how terrible some political ideologies are. You just can't do that when you're reading something coming from a hate group.
People say we should never forget the lessons of the holocaust, perhaps the real lesson behind the holocaust was never learned to be forgotten because here we are, a few decades on, at it again.
*Death Toll Source
*The Silencing of Hans Schmidt (Not so sure about the integrity of this source)
| 46 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
Comment by Damo
For the Sake of Argument
My Apologetics
Probably the most disappointing attitude that I have found when reading blogs is the concept of collective guilt and thinnly vieled racism.
Unfortunately it is alosing battle because this concept makes picking a side so much easier.
Some people are worse than others and lack any sense of justice, fairness or logic. They have chosen a side and decided to use a leaf out of the L Ron Hubbard mentality of 'Fair Game'. Always attack, never defend, because everything is a power struggle.
I can think of two immediately that come to mind, however there are others just as guilty.
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
Just willingly brainwashing yourself.
Comment by charliesgirl_992000
Histeries, Mysteries and what not
Lifes little slices
Mystical Creativity
Tammy
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
I haven't read it myself but it gives some interesting perspective into what may have actually given Hitler the ability to do what he did.
Comment by Annoyamouse
Hitlers deal was: he was going to purify the nation by getting rid of the people of non Germanic blood. Stalins deal was: he was going to purify the nation by getting rid of the people that didn't belive his idealogies.
Poor Stalin had a tough job, people could agree in public and disagree in private. So he had to kill a lot more people than Hitler could, to be certian the job was done right. If Stalin also saught racial purity he would be in a lot of trouble because Russia was huge too many different races and religions. So Stalin and his, multiracial multifaith but one ideology for the nation, friends went out and slaughtered millions.
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
Actually Hitler wasn't looking to kill everyone with non-Germanic blood, he saw the Turks in high regard, as always his ambitions where political, not religous.
The fact he hated Jews in particular is interesting and one of debate, if we are to believe he was going about religous or racial cleasning his character would have way too many holes.
For instance while putting Arabs just over Jews he put Turks third on his list of best people though both the Arabs and Turks were Muslims. Yet Jews, some of which were German where seen as very lowly by him. Clearly it wasn't race or religion for him except when it came to Jews.
Which leads me to believe his motives were purely political with some form of deep hatred he had towards Jews. Perhaps he didn't hate Jews even, one could argue he used Jews as a scapegoat, create a fake enemy that would get the Germans to join his cause, it was convenient fact that some Jews were members of the communist party as such targetting Jews as the real bad guys gave him the public approval he needed to go to war with Russia. Inevitably he wanted to conquer the world.
Comment by Annoyamouse