Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Labor vs Liberal : who will make the better government?

November 19th 2007 03:17
Welcome to the first ever Debate Battle!

In the lead up to a Federal Election in Australia this weekend, the topic for today is:

Labor vs Liberal : who will make the better government?

Do you think the Liberals are better at handling the economy? Was work choices a step to far? Is Labor going to fix Global Warming? Do you just think Kevin is an awfully nice chap and it's time for Old Man Howard to step down?

To join in leave a comment below.




John Howard

VS


(point of note: I couldn't find a larger enough caricature of Kevin Rudd).
194
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
29 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by jon

November 19th 2007 03:39
Thanks to Ahmed for volunteering to host the first ever DebateBattle. If you would like to host a Debate on your blog (they don't have to be as serious as this) leave a comment on this post or send me a PM.

The rules of DebateBattle are as follows:

1) Insults are to be witty and in good humor. Apart from that stick to arguing about the facts.

2) You can take either side of an argument regardless of your actual views. In fact you are encouraged to take the other side now and again, it's mind expanding.

3) The debate will take place via comments in response to the official debate post on the host blog.

4) Anyone can participate.

5) Anonymous comments are discouraged.

Comment by Harry

November 19th 2007 03:47
You know what they say : Politics and Religion

I'm going to vote for Howard because there are too many Union Officials high up in the Labor party who will have too much say. In a global economy we need to have flexible labour laws in order for business to be able to compete.

Having said that we also need a great education system and I've not been impressed with how the Liberals (for any Americans out there, the Liberals are actually the conservative party in Australia) have run down the tertiary education system.

They have also not invested in Renewable energy research, or supported the renewable energy industry as much as they should have. Completely regardless of Global Warming it's a growth industry that we are silly not to support.

For me it's the Liberals, but they need a good kick up the pants.

Comment by Dexter

November 19th 2007 03:48
Rudd is just a younger Howard -- in so many ways. They parties are so similar it's depressing.

Comment by Louie

November 19th 2007 03:58
I am going to go Liberal, purely because I heard that the first thing Labor is going to do when they get in is to put petrol prices up to $1.50 .....if its scaremongering then it worked on me

It wouls take a denial from the ohrses mouth to convince me they won't do this.


Comment by Optomistic Opportunism

November 19th 2007 04:15
Go the Greens. If you disagree with Australia's longstanding and well-fought position in the world as a good place to work and the price of war, I don't really understand where you're coming from.

How about we outsource the Prime Minister? I hear the Scandinavians are hot right now.

Jon, I've got an idea for a Debate, related to what people prefer to read about on Orble.

Let me know how its done, I'll let you know what its about.

Comment by Ahmed

November 19th 2007 04:21
I am going to go Liberal, purely because I heard that the first thing Labor is going to do when they get in is to put petrol prices up to $1.50 .....if its scaremongering then it worked on me
Louie, that sounds a whole lot like the liberals propoganda back during the last elections 'if you vote for labor interest rates will go up'. Guess what? Liberals won and the interest rates went up.

If history is to repeat then I think the accusations the Liberal party is making about Labors plans for the future are its own plans.

Comment by jon

November 19th 2007 04:25
Up to 1.50 -- jeepers. What are they going to spend the money on? They would have a revolt on their hands.

OO -- send me a PM about your idea and we can set a date. The next free one is the 24th of Dec but if you don't want Xmas eve then it would be the 31st of Dec or the 7th of Jan. If anyone else wants to host a debate send me a PM or comment on this post.

Comment by katyzzz

November 19th 2007 04:35
Well, I shan't be voting on looks, that would leave me no choice at all,

But, having considered both sides of the argument without doing my brain exercises, I have decided, vote 1. Howard, 2. Family first.

but perhaps it should be the other way around, suffer the little children to come unto me, vote 1. God.

I hope everyone will consider this a well argued response, it is better than no response at all and Congratulation Ahmed, for taking every body on.

Comment by Louie

November 19th 2007 04:38
Ahmed you probably right, but inflation is lead by such things as fuel prices so $1.50 fuel = a whole lotta grief

Anyhow don't go too hard nailing me, i was just having fun to contribute to your debate

But it was a labor guy who said it to me, otherwise i would have thought the same thing as you.

Comment by Ahmed

November 19th 2007 04:43
You sure it wasn't a liberal guy disguised as a labor guy? Can't find any sources on the matter, just typical labor bashes liberal over high petrol prices.

Comment by Lilla

November 19th 2007 05:23
Ahmed,

It is no contest in my mind and my vote is private, and I find I cannot answer anyway, because I feel so strongly on so many things the current government is doing wrong...OMG. Things that will not impact directly on our generation (or them), but in years to come - when eveyone wakes up too late - for our children's children it will be too late to reform without out and out revolution, especially if food is short.

I cannot expect short sighted business people to understand my view, especially those with big investment interests and bottom lines to protect, but anyone who has sense will understand the value of food and water, above that of oil... esp. when so much renewable energy is available.

I wonder which government supports those things more?

All I see from this liberal one, is a widening of the gap between the rich and the poor, in a gradual regression to the work houses of the poor during the 18th century, when the rich lived off the backs of the poor, in a system that slowly degraded their rights, to nothing. I want more for my children than a second rate education and eventual slavery.

They already share a narrowing prospect of owning their own homes... as the noose tightens so slowly, no one really notices...but I do, becuase I run the household budget and I can see the hours spent out - against the dollars in - weighed against the expenditure. It is easy to loose sight of that when we can rely on credit so readily, isn't it?

I want a government that offers education as more important than someone elses war.. and Australian history shows how the liberals come along with big plans whilst reaping the benefits of the labour governments before them ... meanwhile education and health reach all time lows with women dying on the roadside in child labour.

Prisons still have air-conditioning, whilst our children suffer terrible summer heat in sardine boxes on sunbaked paddocks. Farmers are walking off the land and still only denial on Kyoto and the need for new infrastructure to support the changing climate.

Nothing is new in this case of a lack education under liberal rule either, as state figures are fodged to hide illiteracy and skilled professionals are IMPORTED!!! OMG! THat's what 12 yearsof liberal education has bought us too. It will take years to set it to rights... and what's wrong with unions, they won our rights to start with and set up many systems that make democracy function 'equally.' They never ruined The mother-land did they? I thought they fostered the human rights ethic?

I want a government that isn't afraid to stand alone in world trade agreements wihtout feeling it has to lick some countries backside ... and one that subsidises the farmers - like the American government does. I want a government that will put the $100 loose change I had during the 1980's and 1990's back in my pocket, instead of the treasurers coffers.

Many traditions are born from creative effort...
and many followed because of a lack of it.


I want a government that is young enough to consider alternatives to mindless tradition for its' own sake, regardless of the walls collapsing around them (or the sinking of the Titanic). One that will put in tanks for stormwater run off and feed it back to flush our loo's. A government that will support 'clean technologies' and not just the mindless sale of uranium as the agenda, for a future 'super-centre' for uranium supplies and ugly nuclear desalination plants all over the place.

I want a government that will stop the multi-nationals like woolworths from competing out the small guy who sells the locally grown produce. I want to be able to buy local from little novelty shops like I used to, not just Chinese crap from dime-a-dozen $2 stores (which allowed for the erossion of our standards of living by some 27% at the turn of the millenium).

I want kyoto ratified and decent 'green' insfrastructure subsidies offered to every household ... I want a government who will tell Bush to bugger off and not buy Coca Cola!

I want a lot... but above all that, I do not want Peter Costello as my Prime Minister.

Which government DO YOU think will give me all that?

Lilla ...

Comment by Damo

November 19th 2007 05:28
I confess Ithat I once help vote Howard in.
Did not like him much but disliked Keating more at the time.
Now Keating can't hurt me anymore I find him witty and amuzing.

I want to feel the same about Howard.

Comment by Louie

November 19th 2007 05:33
Ill do some more digging Ahmed and come back to you.

Lilla what you want is admirable and I hope we get it.

We have had discussions on bi-partisan issues in the past and i wish everything on your list was bi-partisan, we would certainly have a better country, .....

would that then make the election a popularity contest? then could we like vote for Rove or Kylie or just double up and chuck it in with the australian Idol contest

P.S. I know these things aren't a laughing matter, I really think all your issues should be the minimum standard that austrailan's deserve.


Comment by Lilla

November 19th 2007 05:44
Louie,

I know these things aren't a laughing matter, I really think all your issues should be the minimum standard that austrailan's deserve.

And so we do. So for me, it is a game of numbers and the vote will go to the one who will give the most of them on my list (and who doesn't have Peter Costello as an alternative).

I am not interested in popularity of promises that plays on mass hysteria - as is evident in America - although in defense of that country, I have to say that they do take the policies being offered a little more seriously than her ein OZ.

However, the amount of money wasted in advertising campaigns is another issue... and I want a government who doesn't spend much in advertising, but puts air-conditioners into classrooms.

Sadly, I think many still feel it to be a BIG joke, like the cricket who chirped all summer long.

Lilla ...

Comment by Ahmed

November 19th 2007 05:46
Lilla, I agree on your points, while the Liberal government has benefited big businesses it has completely ignored the needs of the people arguing that whats good for a free market economy will eventually show its benefits to the people. The problem with that line of reasoning is self evident and it doesn't take a genius to realize that ignoring public welfare, government controlled welfare at that, will effect the populations generel well being.

While we may be looking for a government thats new and daring, one that will invest for the future rather than the present, it's apparent that the scare tactics employed by both the Liberal and Labor parties will ensure that either one of the parties will get in and not one of the more daring ones.

Perhaps it's just that people aren't daring enough to try another line of thought, it's become stagnant in most peoples minds that more of the same is good, better tried and true. To that end Labor has more or less remolded itself to be another Liberal party, albeit with some slight variations but nothing major.

So what will happen come the elections? Honestly I'd be surprised if anyone but Howard wins. It is more than apparent that the Labor party isn't breaking any ground and more or less being generel dicks. John Howard is pulling out a few tricks to get votes, slinging dirt and making empty promises, an art he's mastered. Dare I say Australians are gullible enough to vote for this man based on these empty promises? But it isn't just that, it's the fear of change and the lack of enthusiasm for change.

Comment by Louie

November 19th 2007 05:48
However, the amount of money wasted in advertising campaigns is another issue... and I want a government who doesn't spend much in advertising, but puts air-conditioners into classrooms.

Couldn't agree with you more, how much are they spending?? it is a joke, both parties advertising in Prime Time last night, think of all the better places that money could be spent other than Ad and TV execs Ferrari's....whats the bet if you did the no's Ad spaces are more exy during an election and everyone would get a discount EXCEPT a political party.....

Comment by Ahmed

November 19th 2007 05:51
I'm quite sure the liberal party gets cheaper ads since those execs love 'em to bits.

Comment by Louie

November 19th 2007 05:53
nah more like benefits, like yacht trips and lunches and free use of private jets and stuff

Comment by Lilla

November 20th 2007 00:06
I hate this preferrential crap too as it misdirects the voter.

Opto, do you know who the Greens will give their votes to, is it labor?

Ahmed, do you know who the other parties give their votes too this time round... I have lost track of it all since I started home schooling my children.

Thanks

Lilla ...

Comment by Optomistic Opportunism

November 20th 2007 11:25
Hey Lilla,

Greens and Labor go together like Nationals and Liberal.

Although one does wonder why... but it is ultimately up to us being educated consumers in our own right which will determine our future.

And that's not just for the election.

I truly believe there will be serious disasters taking place if people continue to simply accept oil and a property boom and oversecurity leading to that sense of emptiness which I actually find myself feeling abit these days (but that may just be from losing afew kilos).

But then I'm just a true believer.

And I am scared by the power the media are trying to exert in these matters. Politicians should not be hyped-up salesmen, buying loyalty from those who don't really need the money.

But in the end, its all very simple when it comes to the two-party preference. It seems the well off may be realising the continual fall from grace of those who were already beneath.

And everyone knows its already lonely at the top as it is.

Comment by Brenton

November 20th 2007 11:54
Out of the two Labour. I belive in good economic managwement, but not at the cost of social standards. That is what we see now.

But I think Greens are best.

Comment by Lilla

November 21st 2007 01:17
Thanks Opto,

We'll add some Greens then, I'm not sure of their economic policies on health and education, foreign trade and all, but Bob has had some bonza ideaz in his time and been hushed on a number of them... I like that... and agree with everything you've said. *chuckle* yeah, in science experiements, it is always the scum that floats.

Cheers,

Lilla ...

Comment by Cibbuano

November 21st 2007 02:36
I'm not Australian so I don't 'get' to vote.

It's fun jeering from the sidelines, though. Since Australia has mandatory voting, I've noticed that Australians are notably tight lipped about their election choices.

It also seems that enough Australians scream about John Howard, but eventually vote for him. 11 years in office? Shee!

I also think this is hilarious: Kevin Rudd vs. John Howard gangsta rap.

Comment by Sheree

November 21st 2007 03:37
Greens and Labor go together like Nationals and Liberal.

Although one does wonder why...

Because they have more in common than you think...

I don't understand why people think Labor and Liberal are similar. They're not. Rudd is a dreamboat compared to Hellhole Howard.

I'll be voting Greens then Labor.
Time to go....JW!

Comment by Optomistic Opportunism

November 21st 2007 04:12
Hello Sheree, nice to meet u.

It is worthwhile pointing out that the Greens are here to keep the big boys and girls from doing too much of a wrong thing.

And that includes corruption from both corners of the boxing ring. Ever wondered how it was a breeze for Carr to get a 200K job with Mac Bank?

Just ask the friendly (sic) people behind the Cross City and Lane Cove tunnels.

Comment by Ahmed

November 21st 2007 07:44
It also seems that enough Australians scream about John Howard, but eventually vote for him. 11 years in office? Shee!

Yeah tell me about it, aren't we just the biggest suckers?

Comment by Anonymous

November 22nd 2007 03:25
i vote for the winner

Comment by john howard

November 22nd 2007 03:26
its tough won, maybe labour

will haveto see on the day

Comment by D. Armenta

November 30th 2007 18:14
OOOh, I'm in late and don't belong in this particular debate, but count me in for the future!

Glad you've gone ahead with it!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
5 Posts
4 Posts
187 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Ahmed's Blogs

3946 Vote(s)
82 Comment(s)
52 Post(s)
3709 Vote(s)
116 Comment(s)
41 Post(s)
Moderated by Ahmed
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]