A Transvestite Lesbian Devil Worshipper Can be President
January 11th 2008 11:41
You know it's kind of funny that the title kind of reminds me of Hillary Clinton, this despite the fact it has nothing to do with her. No, this is about Barack Obama, the Muslim, or so I was told by Fox News after which it was spectacularly debunked and has now managed to resurface again.
I wonder just what sort of profound arrogance it takes that makes someone believe they are justified in lying. Yet even so, the reasoning this lie is based on is mind boggling. I don't see the problem with a Christian being President and in that line of thought I don't see a problem with a Muslim being President, or a Christian or a Jew.
The constitution says that there will be no religious test for office, that is all. By doing so it allows everyone and anyone to run for office but it also gives people the right to choose a Christian or a Muslim simply because of faith. To that end there is absoloutely nothing wrong with even a transvestite lesbian devil worshipper being elected into government. If she (he?) was elected it's only because he (she?) was chosen by the people and no one has a right to say 'but *its* liberal!' or anything in that vein.
Be very wary of those who ever even hint that someone should not be elected because of religion. Such people are the breeding grounds of totalitarian regimes. When you take it upon yourself to decide who is better than who because of their alleged beliefs you start down the path of playing a dictator.
To justify such ideas is to essentially say 'I know better than everyone else just because I'm me', to say such a thing is to of course imply self-perfection. If history has anything to say here it's quite obvious, those who claim perfection seldom are perfect.
I wonder just what sort of profound arrogance it takes that makes someone believe they are justified in lying. Yet even so, the reasoning this lie is based on is mind boggling. I don't see the problem with a Christian being President and in that line of thought I don't see a problem with a Muslim being President, or a Christian or a Jew.
The constitution says that there will be no religious test for office, that is all. By doing so it allows everyone and anyone to run for office but it also gives people the right to choose a Christian or a Muslim simply because of faith. To that end there is absoloutely nothing wrong with even a transvestite lesbian devil worshipper being elected into government. If she (he?) was elected it's only because he (she?) was chosen by the people and no one has a right to say 'but *its* liberal!' or anything in that vein.
Be very wary of those who ever even hint that someone should not be elected because of religion. Such people are the breeding grounds of totalitarian regimes. When you take it upon yourself to decide who is better than who because of their alleged beliefs you start down the path of playing a dictator.
To justify such ideas is to essentially say 'I know better than everyone else just because I'm me', to say such a thing is to of course imply self-perfection. If history has anything to say here it's quite obvious, those who claim perfection seldom are perfect.
| 63 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
Comment by tlcorbin
Coffee Quip
A Global Citizen
Paranormal Paranormal
Is Why
Alaska Chronicle
Comment by Ahmed
techy.Bytes
Video Gamer Kids
Little Green Foosballs
PolyKicks
Qwerk
Cinema Three
With the exception of a mass of voters. Which should always be the only thing preventing it, nothing more, nothing less.